Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Paul

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. The additional sources demonstrate the notability of the subject. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Paul[edit]

Christopher Paul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BLP1E. The only media coverage of the subject pertains to his prison sentence for involvement in a bomb plot. Lizard (talk) 21:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete While some people can be notable for convinction of bombing plots, there is not the widespread coverage to move this beyond the rules of not news.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I forgot to mention the conviction's insignificance. Lizard (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nom does not appear to have performed WP:BEFORE searches; I had no trouble locating subject in books and major media. Sources abound, from the year of his arrest through a 2017 book.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and WP:TROUT Nom for failing to perform the most cursory WP:BEFORE. Here's the NY Times article on the indictment [1]. Reuters on the guilty plea [2]. gBook hits on "Christopher Paul" + "al qaeda" [3] Sheesh.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 02:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that I added a few sources, including a university press book with an entire chapter on Paul (Chapter 5). It provides a detailed biography form which a better article can be written.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:50, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 05:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • a very modest WP:HEYMANN, I did a very modest upgrade, adding sources about his life and career. Note that sources including including a new book out from Brookings this spring satisfies WP:PERSISTENCE and sources including a book by Larry Elder criticizing Paul Law's poor life choices carry it past WP:GNG. Also Note that "Christopher Paul" is only one of the names he uses, his birth name and faith names produce other sources from which a good article could be created.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per E.M Gregorys reasonings. and WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christopher_Paul&oldid=1137713252"