Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Ingram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Ingram[edit]

Christopher Ingram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable founder of a PR company with no significant coverage, although he has had appearances on notable shows. Was deleted by WP:PROD for notability reasons, and then restored by request from the subject at WP:REFUND. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 04:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 02:06, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple references to external links indicating this is not just some guy with a PR company as initial concern suggested. Subject is a notable media personality in Florida (radio, TV, Newpaper), and has been a contributor to Fox, MSNBC, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.200.99.139 (talk) 14:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC) 47.200.99.139 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Local notability doesn't count, and being a contributor to a show also isn't an inclusion criterion. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:05, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Still no consensus even after two relists
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 03:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.