Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Hyde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Hyde

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article subject is notable only for a single event, and does not meet the criteria set out in WP:NCRIMINAL. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Alabama, and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Killing three people during a robbery isn't notable, being on death row neither. Coverage is strictly news items of his various incidents. Oaktree b (talk) 16:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and the reason NCRIMINAL exists; this man simply is not notable and should not have the glory of their own page. Nate • (chatter) 17:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't define it as glory, especially here. I would say having a page is a negative in most cases. Sure there are some crimes that may be a consideration with, but this is clearly not one of them. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now: I created this article thinking it would be notable for a few reasons, 1. His crimes occurred in 2 states, one of which was an attempted murder, had that victim died, he could have had 4 victims killed in separate incidents, some might say that's a serial killer or in this case an "attempted serial killer" 2. case was covered by various news outlets, the Associated Press being the big one as that a national one, also news agencies outside Alabama covered it (Edwardsville Intelligencer: Illinois and Cape Cod Times: Massachusetts) 3. The random location of the crime, I don't recall there being many multiple slayings at Funereal Homes, that stood out to me and I thought that was unique for a triple homicide case. The circumstances of the case overall seemed very unusual. While it may be a stub, a stub can still be notable. YatesTucker00090 (talk) 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since crime fails WP:NEVENT. Coverage is not in depth enough or over a long enough period of time. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per @YatesTucker00090

Taksoh17 (talk) 15:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E. He does not meet the requirements of WP:CRIMINAL and the crime itself was not a notable WP:NEVENT. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.