Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Green (legal scholar)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 01:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Green (legal scholar)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Law, United States of America, and Mississippi. UtherSRG (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Not seeing evidence that the subject meets WP:PROF. Possibly too early career, the subject appears to have received his PhD in 2006. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- found that he holds a named chair as a full professor at a well-established large institution which is an automatic keep category per WP:NPROF. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Mscuthbert. BD2412 T 02:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clear pass of WP:PROF#C5. His citation numbers are respectable but not huge (134 for "Originalism and the Sense-Reference Distinction" and then going down from there) but I have the impression that constitutional law is a low-citation subject so I don't find this particularly concerning. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.