Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Brett Bailey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Brett Bailey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC. There are some secondary sources which are quite detailed, but appear to be more a review of his performance than a biography. See [1][2][3][4][5]. Also appears to fail WP:ENT. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the sources added to justify removed of the speedy deletion tag do not establish notability. Most refs appear to be advertising or peripheral mentions. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete - New sources evidencing cult status in the UK theatre community have been added. References chosen demonstrate industry profile and acclaim. 17:13, 25 March 2017 (GMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Churlishmeg (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:31, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources are either WP:PRIMARY, not independent of the subject (his own website), or passing entions in the context of a work rather than for himself. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 17:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per O Fortuna, passing mentions in press. L3X1 (distant write) 20:22, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.