Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas in the City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 15:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas in the City

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, does not have significant coverage, does not meet WP:NF nor WP:GNG BOVINEBOY2008 20:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reviews at Common Sense Media [[1]] and the Movie Scene [[2]]. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- MovieScene is a blog, does not count towards notability per WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 21:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Another review at LetterboxDVD [[3]] Donaldd23 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Letterboxd is also all user generated reviews. BOVINEBOY2008 21:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not notable aside from standard reviews, user-generated content, and a Pasadena Star News article that just looks like routine coverage of local filming with no lasting notability.
Delete we lack the multiple reviews in reliable sources that are needed to show a film is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.