Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Magic (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas Magic (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, does not have significant coverage by independent sources - only can find short blurbs or reviews from blogs, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 09:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a subject's own website and a listing in the non-reliable IMDb are not enough to show that anything is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hallmark movies are awesome, but the sheer volume with which they pump out tasty little morsels of holiday schmaltz makes it harder for individual ones to gain media attention. This is one of those ones that just never gained any substantial coverage in the media beyond trivial mentions. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 14:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG/WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 21:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Regardless of whether it was distributed theatrically or on television, a film is not automatically notable just because IMDb and its own self-published production website offer technical verification that it exists — the notability test for films is a question of the amount of reliable source coverage about the film that can or cannot be shown in media to demonstrate the film's significance: attention from film or television critics, indication that it won or was nominated for one or more notable film or television awards, and on and so forth. But there are no claims like that on offer here, and nothing that the article does say is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have any actual sources. Bearcat (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of coverage in reliable independent sources. No evidence of notability. --Ashley yoursmile! 12:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.