Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Hamelin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Christine Hamelin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod, non-notable writer. Ridernyc (talk) 00:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment ten-fold G book hits...but hard to tell if it is all the same person. CTJF83 chat 06:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Definitely a different person. Most of those hits seem to be about a biologist. Ridernyc (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oddly enough I don't find it at all difficult to tell. Many of them are quite clearly not this Christine Hamelin, and those that are (or may be) this one make only passing mention of her. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The two "references" given are merely links to google books search results. In one case it looks as though she has written a brief review included in the book, and in the other she is merely cited as a source for a quotation from someone else (Janette Turner hospital). There is nothing that remotely suggests she is notable in her own right. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.