Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Dawood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Shahzada Dawood#Personal life. Daniel (talk) 01:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Dawood[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Refs are profiles, WP:SPS sources and PR. UPE. scope_creep^Talk 08:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Germany, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shahzada Dawood § Personal life. Not finding SIGCOV, but a redirect is appropriate. House Blaster^talk 23:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The articles falls on Wikipedia's guidelines of Notability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)), which doesn't state that you can't have a wikipedia page if you are not a published author. Her page has over hundreds and thousands of views, shouldn't that be a reason to keep this?

The idea for Wikipedia is to give public access of knowledge to all. If people are looking for Christine and finding it helpful, it serves the purpose. I find it baseless to delete. Inthejungle32 (talk) 18:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editor is a WP:SPA likely a WP:UPE sent in by the agency to save this dreadful article. scope_creep^Talk 18:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information about what? There is more information on her husband's death than about her. I"m not sure why people would be looking for her on wikipedia. Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

agree. this article is not noteable other than her husband's death and whom has his own article. there are many sources online about her and there is reallt no need for a wikipedia article. 86.17.54.133 (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Outside of her husband's death, there is nothing about her. I can't find any mentions of her that aren't in relation to her husband; her career seems rather routine/non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 14:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shahzada Dawood#Personal life as an alternative to deletion, I did not find sources that would satisfy GNG or NBASIC. No SIGCOV found, if there are at least WP:THREE sources that satisfy notability guidelines stated above, please ping. The reasoning for "keep" stated above is not convincing. ~ Tails Wx 16:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.