Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Dagher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Dagher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced biography by an apparent WP:COI editor who is creating multiple promotional articles. Fails WP:ANYBIO. - Mr X 18:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 18:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn'tsatisfy WP:ANYBIO. PaintedCarpet (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 17:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Fails WP:ANYBIO. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We have good recent precedent (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Barbara_Vanden_Bussche_(2nd_nomination)) supporting the view that not all beauty queens (or kings, I suppose) are notable. RomanSpa (talk) 03:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.