Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian University GlobalNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Our Daily Bread Ministries. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christian University GlobalNet[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, has been tagged for 8 years. Fails WP:GNG. JayJay^{What did I do?} 21:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. JayJay^{What did I do?} 21:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. JayJay^{What did I do?} 21:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. JayJay^{What did I do?} 21:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the parent organisation Our Daily Bread Ministries, where it would be more useful than a list of countries (or rather flags) where the organisation has offices. For an on-line education facility, the monthly hit rate might be enough to make it notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. I found no independent reliable coverage of this organization at all in a WP:BEFORE search I did. @Peterkingiron, an unsourced page hits claim is meaningless for notability purposes. Where is the coverage? The article, which is basically just a staff/course directory, has languished for eight years as the nom pointed out because this isn't a notable topic. It's the abandoned pet project of a WP:SPA. Newshunter12 (talk) 21:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing inherently wrong with being an SPA and has nothing to do with notability, Atlantic306 (talk) 02:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306 When no independent coverage of a topic can be located and only primary sources are used in the article, the article creator being a WP:SPA is a major red flag regarding total lack of notability and abusing Wikipedia for ones own narrow private purposes. In other words, I was saying this article (which amounts to a business directory/brochure) is a case of WP:PROMO and should be deleted for that as well. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is a ridiculous demonisation of SPAs, an SPA is not always a coi editor and for all we know he could have died before editing further Atlantic306 (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Our Daily Bread Ministries: Barely found anything about the organization. It's best to partially discuss it in the target article. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.