Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Seifert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Seifert[edit]

Another article in series on OSVDB "manglers": Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susam Pal, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Sullo. No notable Google results. Delete per WP:BIO. Jyothisingh 14:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - References [1] and [2] are notable IMHO. -- Root exploit 15:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[3] says that he is one of the two winners of an scholarship program. [4] is an article written by him, and says that he is a member of the New Zealand Honeynet Alliance. How does this make him notable for Wikipedia

Delete Graduate student who won a scholarship. Fan-1967 06:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence from reliable sources that WP:BIO is met. MER-C 08:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO. Press releases and web sites are not a reliable independent sources. Article's effusive language ("well-known", "elire") doesn't help either. --Shirahadasha 10:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless additional reliable sources are added by end of this AfD Alf photoman 17:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think Root exploit fails to grasp what reliable sources are. Christian Seifert is, it appears, a talented and dynamic graduate student. However, Wikipedia, I'm sorry to say, does not care. Pascal.Tesson 09:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.