Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Gill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 22:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Gill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article with a confusing history. I recently restored this article to what I felt was the last good version [1] which was for an actor (with a degree in art). Previous to my reversion it was an unsourced article on an artist [2] with no mention of acting. There does appear to be an artist [3] and there is an IMDB entry [4] but it is unclear whether this is one person or two. However it is clear that one or both are not notable. There are no sources other than the artist's own website and the IMDB entry. The IMDB entry shows a handful of minor roles. Google searches for the artist do not show any suitable sources (especially after removing hits to a comics artist Joel Christian Gill). The article appears to have been heavily edited by the artist himself, per his message at my talk User talk:Tassedethe#Christian Gill, Artist. Delete page as no reliable 3rd party sources to show notability, fails WP:ANYBIO Tassedethe (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable no matter if this is the actor, the artist or if they're both the same. Christian Gill the actor only had a few bit parts (and so doesn't meet WP:NACTOR), and I can't find any coverage at all of Christian Gill the artist (or his so-called "Illuminism" movement). Kolbasz (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not appear to have had a career that would make him worthy of inclusion. --Michig (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as by far nothing minimally convincing for any applicable notability, especially given the current contents which are nowhere near convincing, and my searches have found nothing better.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs)
Delete non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.