Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Democratic Party USA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Democratic Party USA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These don't usually work out well in CSD and get recreated if deleted. The issue is a lack of notability regarding a "newly forming" political party. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- No reliable third party sources. Its present notability seems to be nonexistent. Bzweebl (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete News searches come up empty - this new political party doesn't seem to have done anything of note beyond building a website and a facebook page. No opposition to recreation in future if notability is established, but right now it's too soon. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - After searching, not finding coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete no evidence of coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 03:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 18:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - No apparent existing reliable secondary sources, purely original research.--JayJasper (talk) 22:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of reliable sources. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lack of RS, WP:HAMMER. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 18:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources here, none that I can find anywhere that are reliable. Aaron Booth (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too soon for this one. While various Christian Democratic Partys have notability in other countries,[1] this "newly forming third party platform" does not have the coverage required. Maybe after it actually forms up. Maybe not. But for now.... nope. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yaloe (talk) 04:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a discussion, not a poll. Could you please explain your reasoning? Thanks. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 21:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.