Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Basketball League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As no sources to meet the requirements of WP:GNG have been presented, the article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Basketball League[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable basketball league. There is no real information about this league other than a webpage and a facebook page. Might be a pay-to-play league instead of a semi-pro or professional league. LionMans Account (talk) 19:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The league is NOT a pay-to-play league - and there is more than "a webpage and facebook page" as stated. I work with many of these teams (several who also compete in the ABA). If this league is not "notable" then several other minor basketball league (ABA, EBA, UBL, etc.) should be deleted as well... TheScottDL (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IKNOWIT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS are not reasons for keeping. LibStar (talk) 11:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. LionMans Account (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. LionMans Account (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep see above.TheScottDL (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacking sources, not a notable league. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 13:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only two sources provided are this, is not a reliable source since it is a blog, and this, which doesn't even load (at least not for me; it also is a news announcement, not definitive article about the league unto itself). I'm not finding any non-Facebook, non-blog articles in a Google search either. Jrcla2 (talk) 23:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The 'league's' website is largely devoid of information. No players listed at all. MiracleMat (talk) 04:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete lacking in depth third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 11:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, due to the lack of significant, reliable coverage, as required in WP:GNG. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.