Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian-ism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Christianity. – Sceptr e ^(Talk) 12:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christian-ism

Neologism: christian-ism is a religion loosely based on the teachings of Jesus, but doesn't necessary adhere to all of the teachings of Jesus. possible attack. per a note on the author's talk page, this has been deleted twice already, so this time it's delete and protect. bikeable (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this changes my opinion. Unless referances can be found, I agree with the delete and protect vote. 66.236.0.12 22:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC) (registering as Grinnblade when I get off school computers)[reply]

Just for reference, here's my original comment on the talk page.

I don't think this needs to be SD'd -- while it is by no means a decent article right now, it sounds plausible -- that is, this article does not sound like patent nonsense to me. I added the cleanup and stub tags, though. 66.236.0.12 22:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC) (will register as Grinnblade when I get home).

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Christian-ism"

Comments by 66.236.0.12 above are by Grinnblade.

Redirect to Christianity. Google does return a large number of results on this term; but as far as I can see, it's usually used synonymously with Christianity. ~ Booyabazooka 23:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~A large number? Google for "christian-ism" gets me just over 100 unique results, which is pretty paltry, and there does not appear to be much logic to their use in the way described.~~ bikeable (talk) 23:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my bad, without a hyphen it's quite popular -- for some reason I missed that. Looks like a synonym for Christianity, so redirect is ok. bikeable (talk) 23:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
W.marsh 04:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Christianity per Booyabazooka. --Ter e nc e Ong 06:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article doesn't currently establish the notability of subject or the importance of the particular suggested interpretation of Christian-ism. Googling on this topic failed to challenge my personal view that this patricular interpretation of Christian-ism is of limited importance and currency. Politepunk 09:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per politepunk. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 15:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Having investigated the top 30 Google results for Christianism there's too much variety in the way this word is being used for a coherent article to be written. That some people are trying to coin this word to parallel Islamism is clear enough, but the article doesn't report that. I don't see this establishing itself, but if it does that will become clear in due course. For the moment, delete. JGF Wilks 16:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect As per Bikeable --Larsinio
Redirect and protect as per nom. Sandstein 10:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and protect per nom. This is a neologism, no matter how you slice the pie. --Hyphen5 09:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, per above - While googling does not necessarily indicate that "Christianism" is precisely the same as "Christianity," I still feel that the redirect is appropriate.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.