Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissy Gephardt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chrissy Gephardt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or merge with Dick Gephardt article -- thoroughly non-notable; does not derive notability by connection to notable relative (in this case her father). Quis separabit? 15:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete right now she is the daughter of a notable person. I don't think switching parties:) makes her notable. Unless she is active in some sort of movement for those coming out or notable in some other way she fails all notability standards.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've worked on the article and added references. Gephardt was in the news over time and a significant number of articles are about her in particular, so her notability is not just inherited. She was the first LGBT member to be prominently featured in a US political campaign as referenced in the article. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Concur with Megalibrarygirl. Notability is not temporary. Once she became the subject of stories calling her a pioneer for other LGBT family members of politicians to be out, and was featured in a documentary, her notability separated from her father's. Meets GNG, reliable sources, over time, with significant coverage of subject. SusunW (talk) 20:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Megalibrarygirl and SusunW. Funcrunch (talk) 21:15, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not substantiated by sources. My attention was drawn to this AfD by its posting on the WiR talk page.[1] Xxanthippe (talk) 22:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep: Multiple magazine cover stories, documentary, clearly meets GNG independent of her family. Montanabw^(talk) 05:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Megalibrarygirl and SusunW. --Rosiestep (talk) 09:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.