Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrism and Fenris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chrism and Fenris[edit]

Chrism and Fenris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged by Duffbeerforme for lack of WP:NOTABILITY 7 years ago; still no resolution. There is coverage, but I don't think it's enough to meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The only source that looks promising is the book Experimental Music: Audio Explorations in Australia but the only content about this duo in there is "and Chrism and Fenris, who reconfigure Commodore 64 and GameBoy controllers to make their music". Nothing much else found from a Google search. --Michig (talk) 09:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 05:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. WAMi awards are regional. I did find a few gig listing but nothing non trivial. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.