Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Stanton (actor) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 06:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Stanton (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject apparently had a recurring role on M.I. High, but he is not even mentioned on the page for that program. Has had a few other small role but nothing significant as required to pass WP:NACTOR. Also, unable to find non-trivial coverage in any reliable sources independent of the subject, so WP:GNG is not met either. —J04n(talk page) 12:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ——J04n(talk page) 12:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ——J04n(talk page) 12:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment a number of named roles in films and one-ofs in telesvision series, added to recurring in 29 episodes of M.I. High seem to push nicely at WP:ENT. Yes, commonness of name will make sourcing difficult. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems to have had a few roles, but the lack of reliable secondary sources make it difficult to write a decent biography. Kevin (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I can't find any sources, and he's not mentioned in the MI High article. --Nuujinn (talk) 20:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:RS found but I did find what seems to be plagiarism here. If you cursor over his name near the bottom of the page, the exact same sentence from the Wiki article pops up. Wolfstorm000 (talk) 17:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is the last unreferenced BLP dating from March 2008, thanks to J04n! I concur in the delete recommendation.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 05:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be notable, but BLPs require a source. No source = no article. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 14:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.