Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Saint Clark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Saint Clark[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already tagged for notability, I don't believe that this person is notable. Just one of hundreds of tattoo artists Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 09:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 09:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Going to have to vote delete on this one. There are tons of tattoo artists out there, and nothing to show this one is particularly special. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 02:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as currently questionable, delete for now at best. SwisterTwister talk 23:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete online refs either failed verification or dead link. Fails WP:ARTIST Mduvekot (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Unable to find anything which makes this person notable. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Did a quick WP:BEFORE search and didn't come up with anything to suggest this individual passes WP:SIGCOV. Mkdw ^talk 06:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.