Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Ronayne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 03:12, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Ronayne

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is all really just resume stuff. The subject hasn't had positions that make him notable, the article (and see the history) reads like it came from LinkedIn, and the sourcing is lousy--either primary or corporate/community fluff like this. No proof of notability by any of our standards. Note that the article was "curated" by a (declared) COI editor, User:Abbeyhughes13. Drmies (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Ohio. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another political wiki entry, currently running for office. The position itself would be non-notable, so this fellow isn't notable either. Oaktree b (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While some holders of the postion Ronayne is running for will be notable as a result of that positon (it is the county executive of a large metropolitan county), merely holding it is not enough to be notable, and he does not even hold it yet so there is no current justification for the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or retarget. I agree that the article needs work and may not currently meet WP:NPOL, but as the leading candidate in the 2022 Cuyahoga County executive election, there's a very good chance he'll be elected as the County Executive of Cuyahoga County, Ohio in a few months. Deleting the article would be counterproductive, because we'd need to re-create it the near future. If there's no appetite to keep the article, it can be temporarily redirected to the article on the election. - Eureka Lott 01:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP: NPOL and WP:SIGCOV. No policy based rationale for keeping this article.4meter4 (talk) 02:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.