Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Pittman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mkdwtalk 22:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris Pittman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Extremely non notable musician. Koala15 (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 6. Snotbot t • c » 21:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 22:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete being a musician with one namable release does not pass notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 23:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - One release on Atlantic. No coverage about him in reliable sources. The allmusic review source has this to say: Atlantic's early-'90s roster was littered with competent but unassuming urban contemporary, dance-pop, and hip-hop types who could put all the ingredients in the pot, but never made anything out of them. Here was one more. -- Whpq (talk) 14:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.