Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Osborne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 19:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Osborne[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very little claim to notability: most of it is unsourced and the references are minimal in covering him in any detail. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Community activist far from notable. Page reads like a puff piece. Meatsgains (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ⁓ Notable? No. Dziban303 (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I note that the main contributor to this article appears to have a close connection to the subject, as the only other article that this user has contributed to is Harold Thornton where this edit included the text "Information sourced from Family History Records kept by Chris Osborne, great-nephew." Kerry (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.