Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Mason (artist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:16, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Mason (artist)[edit]

Chris Mason (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. 2 of the 3 sources are Arts Project Victoria publications which are primary sources, and the third is a (minor) exhibition catalogue which is not independent . Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. Flat Out (talk) 23:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as I accepted because of the national museum collection. SwisterTwister talk 08:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Very borderline wikipedia technical general notability but works being held by the NGA I suggest confirms notability. NGA holding meets WP:CREATIVE/WP:ARTIST. Aoziwe (talk) 12:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Looking at WP:ARTIST#4:
"The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums."
a) Nope. b) No evidence of being a substantial part of a significant exhibition. c) Nope. d)No evidence of being represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. NGA holding alone does not meet criteria. (more info on the Home Sweet Home NGA collection found here and here running 11 October 2003 – 18 January 2004)
Wikipedia is not a free webhost for the collection of artist bios for the Northcote-based studio at Arts Project Australia. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 04:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.