Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Macdonald (scientist & author)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Macdonald (scientist & author)[edit]


Chris Macdonald (scientist & author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article that failed AfC as non-notable. Sources do not indicate notability, most of them are sources directly from the subject of the article. CatcherStorm talk 01:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm talk 01:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The article has now been updated to include reputable sources - including popular podcasts, peer reviewed scientific papers, and film and tv credits. Please proceed with article submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrybakerpoet (talkcontribs) 02:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The vast majority of references are articles and papers by him. I didn't find any independent coverage about him. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete However accomplished an article subject may be, notability demands that we have works about the subject, not by the subject. There seems to be no such coverage of this person in either the article or in searches. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nothing substantial than promoting this subject. Should have speed-died under G11 of CSD. KartikeyaS (talk) 07:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.