Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Lawrence (ice hockey)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Lawrence (ice hockey)[edit]

Chris Lawrence (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails NHOCKEY and GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He was on two world-juniors teams. Doesn't that meet WP:NHOCKEY? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, it doesn't. Joeykai (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: No evidence that this unremarkable minor league player meets the GNG, and he certainly fails NHOCKEY. Ravenswing 05:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Only sources are links to his stats so WP:GNG is not met. Also fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY.Mdtemp (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.