Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Kobin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep as neither the nominator nor anyone else favours deletion. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh 01:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kobin

Prod tag removed by page creator, a SPA. Non-notable producer about whom no non-trivial coverage can be found. One of many vanispam pages created by/about/for very minor entertainment industries individuals. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as apparently worked with Tim Sulivan on many projects. Whoever removed the prod apparently did not understand that IMDb is only a tertiary source and should be supported by other 3rd-party sources. If the article is re-prodded, I'll see about improving it as well. The body of work would seem to indicate that the sources are out there. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment i have created a sandbox for this article. Will work to improve it over the next couple days. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 06:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Additionally I found lots to prove notability for Tim Sullivan and will improve THAT article. I found almost as much about the work of Kobin during my Sullivan search and will be able to impove his article as well. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 20:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well... I think I have shown a minor notability HERE. Comments? Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 06:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment it looks considerably better and I haven't objections to keeping it now. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 17:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will move the info from my sandbox to the article. I have done even more since your comment. Thank you much. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 19:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.