Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Harris (author)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Harris (author)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized article about a writer, not reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. The notability claim here is that his work exists, which is not automatically enough in the absence of a properly sourced WP:GNG pass -- but there's absolutely no sourcing being cited here besides his own self-published blog, and the article has been tagged for that problem since 2011 without ever having any new sources added in the meantime. Bearcat (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United Kingdom. Bearcat (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG, produced during the halycon days of 2007 when it seems that if someone had published any book(s) they could have an article, have been unable to find any reviews on harris' work. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not appear to meet notability requirements and I can find nothing of note on the books he is mentioned as being author of that would change this. Dunarc (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails notability criteria. –Ploni (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.