Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Fox (lacrosse)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 22:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chris Fox (lacrosse)[edit]
- Chris Fox (lacrosse) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable semi-pro athlete —teb728 t c 21:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Player of Box Lacrosse and coach for amateur Lacrosse. Nothing found that could support WP:ATHLETE. --Ben Ben (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Author has added further details to the article. Summary for me: Assistant Coach - Offensive Coordinator ... for a college lacrosse team. Reads like a job application. --Ben Ben (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete... arguably speedy delete since "semi-professional lacrosse player" doesn't strike me as a claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE. Borderline A7. Safiel (talk) 23:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I think the article has enough claims of significance that it doesn't qualify for CSD A7. However, the claims in the article don't show that he's notable as an athlete or coach. —C.Fred (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.