Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Edgecombe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Edgecombe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources are in the article to demonstrate notability of this inventor of a green fuel, and, given the subject's era, location and field I would expect to be able to find such sources online, but I see none. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Snow delete. I agree with Phil's assertion, and the only non-Wikipedia Google hit I found was a blog. The article is also an autobiography, as it was created by User:ChrisEdgecombe. Erpert (let's talk about it) 23:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Though I am grateful for his work and he has a nice CV, I don't think he's notable enough to have an article here. I googled it and didn't get anything.--Karljoos (talk) 15:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I previously applied a PROD to the article as the subject fails WP:BIO. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 18:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I suppose it's too late to add them to this discussion, but I'll also mention that HTF-15 and Biofuel 5, fuels claimed to have been developed by Edgecombe, look like articles that should be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I searched Google, and those products appear to be hoaxes created by SPA User:Geekiep. I've tagged the articles as such. Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Better yet, I've done this. Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.