Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chop-Socky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chop-Socky[edit]
- Chop-Socky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
gnews search of "chop socky" reveals a lot of non Australian entries. This search on the groups work shows hardly any coverage. LibStar (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Appears to at least be verifiable: [1], [2].--Michig (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 03:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Delete. A GBooks search turns up nothing relevant for the ensemble; I've also tried GNews searches for the group name and for the surnames of individual members and turned up nothing: [3]; [4]; [5]. Michig's two links are duplicates or syndicated versions of the same content; alone, a single TV listing of a single piece of work of theirs is not enough to indicate substantial coverage for the group. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.