Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cholmondeley Cello

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cholmondeley Cello[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, Notability? A1 (talk) 15:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, a little work prior to nomination goes a long way, I will add some sources. They are not difficult to find. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 16:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable. No compliance with WP:Before. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this seems historically noticeable. SwisterTwister talk 18:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 18:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A quick search shows plenty of sources. Most are just about the record sale price, but some give detailed descriptions and/or history. The subject is clearly notable. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.