Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Noelle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chloe Noelle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

aside from her role on True Blood, I don't see any evidence that even claims she's notable - and I don't think one role satisfies NACTOR. I'm not sure what kind of award is granted to someone for a single episode appearance either (re: awards and noms for New Girl) but there is no meaningful, in depth coverage of Noelle either. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:24, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I was just tagging the article for notability and dependence on primary sources. The role on True Blood was not significant enough to appear in the already enormous cast list provided in that article. It's possible there are some better sources out there and perhaps they will be presented in this discussion, but the sources given in the article are far from sufficient. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:38, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and California. Shellwood (talk) 18:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there is some coverage for her child role in True Blood, but not all that much. She was a cute recurring minor character in seasons four, five, and six, appearing in some of the episodes in those seasons, a total of 19 according to a fan wiki. There's no significant coverage of her since. Pikavoom ^Talk 06:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete when a person's closest to significant role does not get them in stanadard cast lists, we do not have meeting of our very broad inclusion guidelines for those involved in acting.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.