Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Cammeniti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Existing content in its current form is likely unsuitable for a merge. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chloe Cammeniti[edit]

might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with all the usual fancruft issues. a fictional baby, now fictionally in Portugal. delete. Jack Merridew 10:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 10:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 10:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 10:49, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge A long and detailed plot summary / character biography that only a dedicated fan would be interested in. It cannot be re-written to meet WikiProject Soap Opera's notability standards for characters or WP:Notability as the subject has not received real-world coverage in reliable independent sources, so cannot satisfy the inclusion criteria. Matthewedwards : Chat 19:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
merge This needs to be integrated in a combination article. No justification for having it separate. No justification either for not merging, and especially for not having a redirect. None mentioned by the nominator, and the immediately above comment is irrelevant to content that is merely part of a merged article. DGG (talk) 00:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm okay with only the most necessary parts being merged. There's still no point merging a bunch of overly detailed plot details though. Matthewedwards : Chat 07:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unsourced. Only reference is a fansite. Even merged articles should be reliably sourced. WP:V is not negotiable. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 22:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no references, no real-world significance. –Moondyne 03:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.