Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiyo Mihama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Azumanga Daioh characters. MBisanz ^talk 17:05, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chiyo Mihama[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect declined due to secondary sourcing, but one is a primary source that only verifies the seiyuu (voice actress), and the other is a 404'd case study which only seemed to verify that grade-skipping is rare in Japan and made no mention of the character whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Azumanga Daioh characters. For now, sourcing is just too weak to warrant a separate article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:44, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found a source from JC Staff [1], that with the other sources present should be good for a character page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's only a primary source, since it's from the studio who animated the show. We need secondary sources — i.e., from something not associated with the show in some fashion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:19, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Sources do not support real-word notability. 1292simon (talk) 12:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.