Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chino 'Fats' Williams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-amin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chino 'Fats' Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His list of credits is too skinny to satisfy WP:NACTOR. He's mentioned in an LA Times article about his son. That's about it. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Being a bit player in some movies and having significant roles in them is not the same. Let's look at the references: the passing mention in the LA Times article I noted before, an AllMovie credits listing echoed on The New York Times site, and a TV Guide list of credits. Not even close to satisfying WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article could certainly use some improvement, but his part in Weird Science alone makes him notable. It's an iconic scene. 161.113.11.16 (talk) 18:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.