Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese strategic thought

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese strategic thought[edit]

So many problems including no justification for the pages actual existence. Is this just something to interlink other pages? Kickstart70-T-C 04:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The topic is too vague. For one thing, nations can not think, only individual people can. Steve Dufour (talk) 07:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no prejudice against writing a better article later. As it currently stands, this article is like an unsourced essay with a link farm attached. A good article might be possible, but this is not it.--Danaman5 (talk) 08:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Nrswanson (talk) 10:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's the meandering of a parrot. There's nothing substantive. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 11:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We had a bunch of these types of nominations recently, take whatever information possible to use in other strategy articles and Delete. --Banime (talk) 13:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
...five different tags on it? Sorry, but delete per Danaman5 and Trek. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 15:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Steve, Trek. What a meaningless entry. TheAsianGURU (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.