Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Quality Certification Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No "keep" !votes after two relistings. As noted by Metal lunchbox, coverage of the CQC can be effected in the China Compulsory Certificate (CCC) article if appropriate. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

China Quality Certification Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP Flat Out let's discuss it 04:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the CCC mark is totally important and this is the organization that processes it. There's already a good CCC article and it already mentions the CQC. Coverage of the CQC is almost entirely about CCC as one would expect and Notability is not inherited. I would support expanding somewhat the coverage of the CQC in the CCC article to the extent that independent sources can verify such an expansion. If you look at independent coverage and ask if they are talking about CCC or the organization that processes it, then you can see that it's hard to get this past WP:CORP. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 13:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:39, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.