Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Bank Savings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

China Bank Savings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement. has solely primary sources. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge very selectively to Chinabank#Subsidiaries and Affiliates, probably down to only the bare facts in the infobox. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 03:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. 180.172.239.231 (talk) 13:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The article does cite third party sources; will only require some rewriting and removal of promotional phrases. Articles on subsidiaries or affiliate companies offer added traffic to Wikipedia so I am usually against merging. :)--RioHondo (talk) 03:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.