Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Gaming Officer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Greeves (talk • contribs) 17:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chief Gaming Officer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This title seems to be only held by a few people. Neutralitytalk 03:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Lots of sources exist about subjects with the title. Celarnor Talk to me 04:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No reason to delete provided. Compare King. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Compare King? You must be joking. DarkAudit (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you elaborate? They are both titles, both have plenty of coverage demonstrating use. What more would you like to see? Celarnor Talk to me 19:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Equating a ruler of a nation with somebody who is really just an employee with a fancy-sounding title is laughable. DarkAudit (talk) 20:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He's not asking you to compare the subject of King and the subject of the nominated article. He's asking you to compare them as articles on similar subjects; they are similar in that they are both articles about a title held by someone / some people. It doesn't matter if "King" is defined as a ruler of a nation. It's not about people who HOLD the title, its about the TITLE itself. If you want, compare it to Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, etc. Celarnor Talk to me 20:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Equating a ruler of a nation with somebody who is really just an employee with a fancy-sounding title is laughable. DarkAudit (talk) 20:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.