Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago International Model United Nations
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Model United Nations conferences. No prejudice against merging some of the content, if deemed appropriate. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chicago International Model United Nations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable high school conference. Fails WP:GNG. Searches turned up literally zero in-depth references from independent sources. Onel5969 TT me 20:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources have been provided other than the organization's own website and its parent organization's website. Model United Nations organizations are not inherently notable, and a number of them have been deleted at AfD; see User:Metropolitan90#Model United Nations AfD results for a list of some examples. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - sources fail to establish notability Spiderone 20:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Merge into Model United Nations in the United States, which appears to be a strong article with good sourcing that could be supplemented with the content of this article - as a matter of fact, the content from here could simply be merged into a section under Model UN by Region - Midwest. This would allow for the useful information to be kept, and there are likely useful references in the bigger and more general article.--Concertmusic (talk) 21:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 02:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 02:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per above. Model UN as an institution is important, but there doesn't appear to be anything that sets this particular city's event apart from the template. FalconK (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - based on the structure of the merge target, there really is nothing to merge. Onel5969 TT me 13:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or merge...that is the question. One more pass to review the merge situation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Delete or merge...that is the question. One more pass to review the merge situation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete and Redirect to List of Model United Nations conferences, where it's already mentioned. Oppose a merge to MUN in the United States because there's no indication this MUN organization has done anything significant enough to merit a specific mention in that article. I don't see sigcov in any reliable sources. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.