Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chi (manga)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chi (manga)

Personally written and self-published comic (not manga), by Matt Bram. Article was created by the writer (confirmable here where he talks about all the other artilces he will be making) and the comic is only "published" online by him. Absolutely no notability as a book series, comic, or anything else. Wasn't sure if it could be CSD as blatant advertising or some other reason, so AfDing instead. AnmaFinotera (talk) 03:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —AnmaFinotera (talk) 03:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable amateur comic. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if anything, this could be a WP:HOAX. Please also delete the redirects I edited: Chi Manga, Chi (Manga), and Chi manga. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE per Sesshomaru. I agree, seems to be nothing more than a hoax. XD ZeroGiga (talk) 22:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for WP:N, WP:COI, WP:V, WP:FICT, etc. but also salt it and the redlinks as I could see that being one we'd have to police a lot (as they clearly state an aim to generate more non-notable pages). (Emperor (talk) 04:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Delete non-notable vanity piece. Doc Tropics 05:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, google news search turns up nothing, fails notability guidelines. Atyndall93 | talk 05:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone. Obvious vanity, plus once again, manga cannot be made by non-Japanese people (it would simply be a graphic novel). Weeabooism strikes again. JuJube (talk) 07:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wow another amateur comic with characters and a plot -- no sign of anything that belongs in an ecyclopedia here. --Dragonfiend (talk) 09:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn, vanity. JJL (talk) 14:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SNOWBALL? (Emperor (talk) 14:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Delete You can delete it, I figured it would be anyway. But two things, Vanity...Yeah, no, I have no self-pride whatsoever the whole point of this is I'm getting new readers who wanna be caught up but also wanna know what happened in the beginning, so I figured instead of sending one incredibly long message to a buncha people, I'll do this. Secondly, Amateur Comic...I'm neither a comic, nor amateur, I've been writing for years, and I can't draw worth a crap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Finalconflictpro (talk • contribs) 17:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Then you missed the point of Wikipedia. This site is not a place where you can advertise or promote your own creations. Your comic has to meet the notability and verfiability guidelines to get an article in Wikipedia. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 02:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notable. Not covered by Anime News Network or another notable anime/manga site? And all resources are one forum? Zero Kitsune (talk) 04:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under "no assertion of notability". --Masamage ♫ 16:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.