Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetanand Sewraz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chetanand Sewraz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP1E and WP:NOT#NEWS, anyone? The man is a convicted criminal, yes. Is he notable for more than this? No. Is the coverage of sufficient scope and the event of sufficient importance to make up for this? No. Ironholds (talk) 05:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The fact that it says, "little is known" kinda gives a dead giveway he's not notable. I mean, if the news isn't bothering to investigate that far, I suppose he's not that important. And I agree on Ironholds' points. --AllyUnion (talk) 08:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Insignificant crimes by WP standards. The news coverage was presumably over the possibility of his being a terrorist, for which there is apparently no evidence. I'm prepared to accept the possibility of an article about everyone actually so arrested on that charge in the US, but not for this. DGG ( talk ) 01:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:BLP1E. Joe Chill (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.