Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cherussery Ahmed Kutty Musliyar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that this person is notable. There are no sources, and the previous AfD didn't find any, either. I found one, [1], but he is mentioned only in passing. Even if we take everything in the article to be "true", it appears that he was a devout Muslim and a teacher. Even the overly praising article contains no indication that he did anything that meets Wikipedia's sense of notability. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I PRODded this and sent it to the first AfD...still isn't notable. Go Phightins! 22:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:V - no sourcing despite repeated requests (including one AfD that went dead for lack of participation) to do so, for most of the article. We need not discuss notability since verifiable sources that do more than passing mention do not occur (far from sufficient to write a biography), and from what I see in Gbooks, the link above doesn't do more than confirm that the subject existed. Closing admin: please disregard this opinion if enough sources to write a proper bio have appeared by the end of this discussion. Ray^Talk 18:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources provided. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:37, 28 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. How did this even survive the first nomination for deletion? No proof of notability. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because it wasn't taken to the academics and educators AfD forum. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:12, 3 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Delete. There is a mention of the subject here. But, that is hardly sufficient to create a bio article. Salih (talk) 15:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.