Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheriton Manor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheriton Manor[edit]

Unreadable and likely copyvio about somethingorother. "In this brief paper, we argue that Alice de Cerutone is most likely..." OR, too. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 11:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unsuitable for wikipedia in its current "cut+pasted" state. --Oscarthecat 15:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Impenetrable essay. Author needs to rewrite to WP standards, lay the page out according to WP standards, categorise and Wikify as a minimum. Could be moved to the sandbox in the interim if the work is to be undertaken. If left in this state, the textdump should be deleted as it is of use to neither man nor beast. -- (aeropagitica) 18:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - incomprehensible familyhistorycruft. See also Sir William Brockman. Tearlach 20:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original research, possible copyvio from some printed source. Dlyons493 Talk 21:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom and existing arguments. -Rebelguys2 22:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.