Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chennamangalloor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. John254 23:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Chennamangalloor[edit]
- Chennamangalloor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article is entirely unreferenced; a means by which to obtain references is not readily apparent. Per Wikipedia:Attribution, "If an article topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." John254 00:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not readily apparent, huh? Well, to start with, checking the google references (there are more with the alternative spelling of -llur, BTW). Failing that, WP has a pretty enthusiastic group of editors of articles relating to Kerala, so it shouldn't be hard to get some decent info. It's a real place (a reason enough for a keep), and it does indeed seem to have quite a few educational institutes. Grutness...wha? 01:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to be an existing community. Per tradition all physical locations, including villages, towns, and cities, are considered notable. It should also be noted that the word "village" in India may mean a community much larger than a North American or European "village"; a place with (if I read Google correctly) four high schools and one technical university likely has more than a few inhabitants. But we really need to put out a call to Wikipedians in Kerala to expand this. --Charlene 01:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I do not see any violations of policies in this article. --James, La gloria è a dio 03:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.