Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea darling
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chelsea darling[edit]
- Chelsea darling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable model. While the article is well-written and has a number of inline citations, the cites are to her website and various other photography web pages. 115 Google hits [1] (many to a similarly named transsexual), but none of them reliable sources; they cover just about every self-entered modeling and photography website from One Model Place to Model Mayhem to deviantART to Flickr etc. No evidence that she passes WP:BIO as a recognized name model. Fails WP:V, WP:BIO. Ravenswing 03:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- per Ravenswing's excellent and well-researched reasoning. Reyk YO! 04:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Quite clearly fails to pass notability. Well written for what it is though. -Djsasso (talk) 16:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonnotable. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.41.54.162 (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable enough. GoodDay (talk) 21:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete, just not that notable, and not enough for an encyclopedia. Dbrodbeck (talk) 23:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.