Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Provost
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chelsea Provost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The subject of this article cannot be proven to exist by any searches for their name, and the organization Learning to Read in Africa that she supposedly founded also cannot be proven to exist. The article completely fails WP:V, let alone the stricter standards of WP:BLP. This article had a proposed deletion tag which was due to expire, however someone objected to the deletion on the talk page so I brought to AfD instead. -- Atamachat 19:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, unless some references appear, which is unlikely, considering how humble Chelsea Provost seems to be. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the objection on the talk page admitted that no sources could be found. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable sources can be found. Also, this unreferenced original research is unlikely to be verified. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 23:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V and WP:BIO. Happyme22 (talk) 23:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An unreferenced and unknown subject. Doesn't meet notability guidelines. May be a hoax for all we know. Artene50 (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable and non-verifiable. To answer" She isn't on other websites so I can't possible put up citations and references" from the talk page - not all references have to websites but, they must exist and be from reliable 3rd party sources than can be verified. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.