Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheeky Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rollo Armstrong. Outside of four links in the external links section, the article is otherwise unsourced. (non-admin closure) FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 21:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheeky Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label that does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Could be redirected to Rollo Armstrong. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:29, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:29, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:29, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of the more interesting recording companies in London, this could be worked on to pass WP:GNG, With Bands like Faithless with their Faithless Greatest hits, 2, and acts like Dido, who in turn contributed to Eminem famous Stan (song). There is credence for this Recording company. Govvy (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Regardless of how the company may be "interesting", and name checks it gets from working with various artists, there appears to be no significant coverage ever published about the company itself in independent, reliable sources. Said source coverage is typically required to qualify notability for Wikipedia's purposes. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Has an entry in The Virgin Encyclopedia of Dance Music. Would probably be best merged to Rollo Armstrong. --Michig (talk) 21:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Michig's comment
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 14:40, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Rollo Armstrong. Notability isn't inherited therefore it is not relevant how notable the projects or artists are without the company meeting the criteria for notability in its own right. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 16:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability. What I ate for dinner last night is also interesting but doesn't warrant a wikipedia article LikeMeercats (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hello LikeMeercats and Welcome to Wikipedia. It is unusual to find new editors at AfD and very impressive that your 15th edit was to nominate an article for deletion and your 17th edit made here. Just FYI, comments like the above may be ignored by the closer of the AfD as it does not provide sufficient reasoning with reference to policy/guidelines (e.g. WP:ORGIND or WP:GNG, etc). Also, on occasion an alternative to deletion is preferable. If you need any help shout out. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment HighKing Thank you for the info and links! A pet peeve of mine has always been these seemingly random/unnecessary pages that pop up and detract from being able to use Wikipedia as legitimate of a source as possible - thought I should get involved and help! Those links are super helpful though, thank you. LikeMeercats (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.