Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheating online
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete G10 by user:Toddst1, non-admin closure. Have a nice day. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cheating online[edit]
- Cheating online (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced, unencyclopedic POV essay. Basically an attack on Amazon.com (the text was removed from that article as well). PROD removed after 4 days. Delete. MCB (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, for the above stated reasons. Rockhound (talk) 18:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete, attack page. Nakon 18:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a POV rant essay. 23skidoo (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy it now. It's garbage. Qworty (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- G10 Reads like an attack to me. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete for failing WP:NPOV ArcAngel (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ballot stuffing which could use some material about such online fraud. Sources should not be difficult to find since this is obviously a notable issue. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.